Jane Loevinger

Wilber's View

Loevinger supplies Wilber with the specifically ego-developmental leg of the "Habermas/Maslow/Loevinger parallels" he treats as convergent evidence for a single developmental logic running through very different research programs. Where Kohlberg tracks moral reasoning and Maslow tracks motivational needs, Loevinger tracks stages of ego or self-development directly — and Wilber maps her stage language (the "conformist" self giving way to a "conscientious" self) onto the same conventional-to-postconventional transition he finds in Kohlberg's moral stages and Maslow's belongingness-to-self-esteem shift. She's one of a handful of names (with Baldwin, Werner, Graves, Piaget) Wilber credits for the specific historical achievement of finally putting rigorous, research-backed empirical flesh on stage-development claims that, before the second half of the twentieth century, had been mostly speculative.

In Sex, Ecology, Spirituality

"This hierarchy of 'deficiency needs' … bears striking resemblance to … Jane Loevinger's"

One can't help but notice that this hierarchy of "deficiency needs" or "scarce resources" bears striking resemblance to Abraham Maslow's (and Jane Loevinger's and others') present-day ontogenetic needs hierarchy—from safety/power to conventional security/belonging to personal/egoic value to existential meaning.

Sex, Ecology, Spirituality, ch. 5

"The conventional stages of morality (Kohlberg/Gilligan), the belongingness needs (Maslow), the conformist mode (Loevinger)"

This unavoidable (and initially necessary) "sociocentric embeddedness" leads to what is variously known as the conventional stages of morality (Kohlberg/Gilligan), the belongingness needs (Maslow), the conformist mode (Loevinger).

Sex, Ecology, Spirituality, ch. 6

"A 'conscientious' self emerges from a 'conformist' mode (Loevinger)"

"Who am I?" becomes, for the first time, a burning question, and the self-esteem needs emerge from the belongingness needs (Maslow), or a "conscientious" self emerges from a "conformist" mode (Loevinger).

Sex, Ecology, Spirituality, ch. 6

"The stages of consciousness development were outlined … Baldwin, Werner, Graves, Maslow, Piaget, Loevinger"

It was only in the last half of this century that the stages of consciousness development were outlined in any sort of rigorous fashion backed by research—Baldwin, Werner, Graves, Maslow, Piaget, Loevinger, and so on.

Sex, Ecology, Spirituality, ch. 12

See Also

  • maslow — the needs-hierarchy parallel Wilber runs alongside Loevinger's ego stages
  • kohlberg — the moral-stage parallel to the same conformist/postconventional shift
  • habermas — completes the "Habermas/Maslow/Loevinger" convergence Wilber cites
Built with LogoFlowershow